So much of our time in the criminal law world is spent in negotiations. A defense attorney was in my office the other day and we were sharing small talk after we had reached a resolution on a felony he was handling. I made some passing remark about him "wearing" me down because I had made an offer I didn't initially want to make. He quipped back about the result not being overly favorable for his client either (a felony conviction would now find a home on his record.) Then, he made an interesting comment. "The best resolution after fierce negotiations is one that leaves no one happy."Huh. Completely contrary to what I learned in law school. I thought the goal of negotiations was to find an agreement that made everyone happy? Maybe in the civil world, but after thinking long and hard about it, in criminal law, maybe it is the former...Maybe the goal in criminal law is simply a result that everyone can live with, but about which no one is particularly happy.
Labels
13th Ct. of Appeals
1954 Hague Convention
1st Ct. of Appeals
2nd Ct. of Appeals
4th Amendment
4th Ct. of Appeals
5th Amendment
5th Circuit
5th Ct. of Appeals
6th Ct. of Appeals
Ancient Coin Collectors Guild (ACCG)
ancient coins
Archaeological Institute of America (AIA)
Armenia
Arnold Peter Weiss
art loans
attachment action
awards and recognitions
Baltimore coin case
Barry Landau
Belize
Bolivia
Brogan Museum
Bulgaria
Cell Phone
Child Grooming
Child Sexual Assault
China
Civil Rights
Closing Arguments
Confrontation Clause
copper thefts
Crawford
cultural institutions risk management
Cultural Property Advisory Committee (CPAC)
Cultural Property Implementation Act (CPIA)
cultural property protection
Cyprus
Dallas-Fort Worth Criminal Defense
Depositions
Double Jeopardy
Drugs
Due Process
DWI
Egypt
European Union
forfeiture actions
forgeries
Fraud
Funny Stories
Getty
Greece
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
import protections
Indecency with a child
Indecent Exposure
International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM)
International Council of Museums (ICOM)
INTERPOL
Iran
Italy
Jason Savedoff
Jury Charge
Jury Deliberations
lainnya
legislation
looted antiquities
mediation
Meledez-Diaz
memorandum of understanding (MoU)
Miranda
museums
NACDL
National Stolen Property Act (NSPA)
Nazi stolen art
Outcry Statement
Peru
prosecutions
Prosecutor Post
provenance
Reasonable Suspicion
receiving stolen property statutes
Red Lists
repatriation
replevin action
Rubin v. Iran
science
Search and Seizure
seizure
space heritage
stolen art
terrorism funding
Terry Stop
Testimonial
Tex.Crim.App.
theft of major artwork
U.S. Supreme Court
UNESCO Convention (1970)
US v. Khouli et al.
War
Warrant
WWII stolen art
Zeyt'un Gospel
Tuesday, September 12, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
loading...
Popular Posts
-
Part II . CONTACT: www.culturalheritagelawyer.com Sumber http://thetrialwarrior.blogspot.com/
-
The Egyptian Museum, Cairo Source: Bs0u10e01, Creative Commons According to an email by the General Director of The Egyptian Museum in Cairo...
-
In a recent case from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Federal), the court considered whether police interrogation of a susp...
-
If a criminal defendant takes the stand during trial on the merits and denies culpability, but then, after being convicted, chooses not to t...
-
US v. Khouli et al. asks for a change of venue. The defense argues that personal and financial hardships faced by Alshdaifat, a Michigan ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment